Home

Yoldan Geçen niteler Susadım shoe branding europe bvba v adidas and ohim bakan Koreli Çam

Adidas v Shoe Branding—Why Adidas's Three-stripe Mark Means More than  Stripes – Infusion Lawyers
Adidas v Shoe Branding—Why Adidas's Three-stripe Mark Means More than Stripes – Infusion Lawyers

Welcome
Welcome

Shoe Branding Europe v. Adidas: Case History - Trademark - India
Shoe Branding Europe v. Adidas: Case History - Trademark - India

The Five Sense: The Rise of Non-Traditional Trademarks in the Fashion  Industry
The Five Sense: The Rise of Non-Traditional Trademarks in the Fashion Industry

Predmet T-145/14: Tužba podnesena 3. ožujka 2014. – adidas protiv OHIM-a – Shoe  Branding Europe protiv OHIM-a (Amblem s dv
Predmet T-145/14: Tužba podnesena 3. ožujka 2014. – adidas protiv OHIM-a – Shoe Branding Europe protiv OHIM-a (Amblem s dv

Adidas loses three-stripe trademark battle in European court | Intellectual  property | The Guardian
Adidas loses three-stripe trademark battle in European court | Intellectual property | The Guardian

Shoe Branding Europe V. Adidas: Case History
Shoe Branding Europe V. Adidas: Case History

CURIA - Documentos
CURIA - Documentos

Of stripes, positions, and shoes: CJEU's decision in Adidas three-stripe  case - The IPKat
Of stripes, positions, and shoes: CJEU's decision in Adidas three-stripe case - The IPKat

General Court of the European Union PRESS RELEASE No 24/18 adidas may  oppose the registration, as an EU trade mark, of two paral
General Court of the European Union PRESS RELEASE No 24/18 adidas may oppose the registration, as an EU trade mark, of two paral

Adidas & Coca Cola: Two decisions of the EU courts dealing with the  Community trade mark | TTLF Newsletter on Transatlantic Antitrust and IPR  Developments
Adidas & Coca Cola: Two decisions of the EU courts dealing with the Community trade mark | TTLF Newsletter on Transatlantic Antitrust and IPR Developments

TRADE MARKS ORDINANCE (Cap. 559) OPPOSITION TO TRADE MARK APPLICATION NO.:  303083788 MARK: CLASSES: 30, 31, 32 and 35 APPLICA
TRADE MARKS ORDINANCE (Cap. 559) OPPOSITION TO TRADE MARK APPLICATION NO.: 303083788 MARK: CLASSES: 30, 31, 32 and 35 APPLICA

Adidas AG vs Shoe Branding Europe, o la protección de las marcas  renombradas y notorias - Enrique Ortega Burgos
Adidas AG vs Shoe Branding Europe, o la protección de las marcas renombradas y notorias - Enrique Ortega Burgos

The General Court of EU confirms the invalidity of Adidas three-stripes  trademark: Dennemeyer
The General Court of EU confirms the invalidity of Adidas three-stripes trademark: Dennemeyer

The General Court of the EU Confirms that Adidas' “Three Parallel  Equidistant Stripes” EU Figurative Trade Mark is Devoid of Distinctiveness  – SCRIPTed
The General Court of the EU Confirms that Adidas' “Three Parallel Equidistant Stripes” EU Figurative Trade Mark is Devoid of Distinctiveness – SCRIPTed

Of stripes, positions, and shoes: CJEU's decision in Adidas three-stripe  case - The IPKat
Of stripes, positions, and shoes: CJEU's decision in Adidas three-stripe case - The IPKat

Shoe Branding Europe BVBA | Trademark and Copyright Law
Shoe Branding Europe BVBA | Trademark and Copyright Law

Adidas Loses Trademark Infringement Lawsuit to Japanese Footwear Brand
Adidas Loses Trademark Infringement Lawsuit to Japanese Footwear Brand

CURIA - Documents
CURIA - Documents

Case C-396/15 P: Appeal brought on 21 July 2015 by Shoe Branding Europe BVBA  against the judgment of the General Court (Seventh
Case C-396/15 P: Appeal brought on 21 July 2015 by Shoe Branding Europe BVBA against the judgment of the General Court (Seventh

Quirijn Meijnen advocaat: Leopold Meijnen Oosterbaan advocaten: Adidas A.G. vs  OHIM and Shoe Branding Europe BVBA Decision General Court 21 May 2015 Case  T‑145/14, three stripes and third time lucky
Quirijn Meijnen advocaat: Leopold Meijnen Oosterbaan advocaten: Adidas A.G. vs OHIM and Shoe Branding Europe BVBA Decision General Court 21 May 2015 Case T‑145/14, three stripes and third time lucky